 In this Newsletter:
Timely Reminder for Small
Businesses to Steer Clear of
Trouble on Payroll Tax and
Retirement Plan Contributions
Recent Tax Law Changes Factor
Into the Auto Lease Vs. Purchase
Decision
Annual Gift Tax Exclusion Jumping
to $13,000 Next Year
Applicable Federal Rates
|
|
|
|
|
E-News Update |
November
2008 |
|
Timely Reminder for Small Businesses to Steer Clear of Trouble on Payroll Tax and Retirement Plan Contributions |
|
In these trying times, with cash
scarce and credit hard to find, a small business might be tempted to
"temporarily" use money it deducts for taxes and retirement plan
contributions from employees' wages. The Fall 2008 issue of IRS's
Employee Plans News suggests that practitioners remind clients that
failing to remit payroll taxes and retirement plan contributions in
a timely manner not only would violate an employer's legal
obligation, but also could subject them to heavy penalties.
Payroll taxes. IRS suggests that small business employers be
reminded that when they deduct income and Social Security taxes from
employees' wages, the money is not theirs to use, even for a short
period of time. Deducted amounts must be remitted, along with their
portion of payroll taxes, by the next scheduled Federal Tax Deposit
deadline. An employer that doesn't deposit the money on time could
be hit with:
-
penalties for making late deposits and for not depositing the
proper amount; and
-
penalties for failing to file returns and pay taxes when due,
for filing false returns, and for submitting bad checks.
The rate of these penalties increases with each passing day until
deposits are made. Interest is also charged on the total unpaid tax
and the penalty. These penalties and interest can add up quickly and
lead to even bigger financial troubles for noncompliant businesses.
RIA observation: Perhaps the most compelling argument to make is
that a company owner could be personally on the hook for unpaid
payroll tax. Under Code Sec. 6672, when an employer fails to
properly pay over its payroll taxes, IRS can seek to collect a
penalty equal to 100% of the unpaid taxes from any "responsible
person," i.e., a person who (1) is responsible for collecting,
accounting for and paying over payroll taxes and (2) willfully fails
to perform this responsibility.
Employee elective deferrals. Businesses that maintain a retirement
plan and allow employees to make elective deferrals might be tempted
to "borrow" money they deduct from employees' pay for plan
contributions to pay other business expenses. IRS stresses that
employers have fiduciary obligations under the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of '74 (ERISA) to deposit the deducted amounts
as soon as those amounts can be segregated from their own general
assets, but no later than the 15th business day of the month
immediately after the month in which they withheld the
contributions. Under a proposed Dept. of Labor rule, plans with
fewer than 100 participants are treated as meeting this deposit rule
if such contributions are transferred to the plan within 7 business
days from the date those amounts would otherwise have been payable
to the employee in cash.
RIA Checkpoint, Federal Taxes Weekly Alert Newsletter, 10/30/2008,
Volume 54 No. 44
Top
|
|
Recent Tax Law Changes Factor Into the Auto Lease Vs. Purchase Decision |
|
How does a taxpayer compare the after-tax financial cost of leasing and buying a business-use passenger vehicle? It is no simple decision when one considers the various tax provisions concerning depreciation systems, taxable gain or loss on disposition, and the income inclusion that partially offsets the lessee's deduction of lease payments.
The monthly lease payment indifference point is the amount at which the taxpayer is indifferent between leasing and purchasing the vehicle. The dollar amount of the proposed monthly lease payment must be below the indifference point to render the lease alternative more attractive than the purchase alternative. If the monthly lease payment is greater than the indifference point, purchasing the auto is more attractive than the lease alternative. The indifference point is determined by comparing the present value of the after-tax cash flows associated with the purchase and the after-tax cash flows associated with the lease.
The Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 (ESA) permits a 50% additional first-year depreciation deduction for new assets acquired in 2008. The ESA also increases the first-year depreciation allowed by $8,000 for passenger autos to which the 50% additional first-year depreciation deduction applies. Passenger autos built on a truck chassis with a gross vehicle weight rating greater than 6,000 pounds (including minivans and sport utility vehicles (SUVs)) are entitled to the 50% bonus depreciation without limitations on the depreciation allowed. Additionally, the ESA reduced the income inclusion amount that partially offsets the lessee's deduction of lease payments.
SUVs that are built on a truck chassis and rated at more than 6,000 pounds (loaded weight) are exempt from the depreciation limits because such vehicles fall outside the definition of a passenger auto. Because there are no depreciation limits associated with the heavy SUV, there exists the opportunity to use both the 50% bonus depreciation and Section 179 depreciation in the first year. However, use of the Section 179 deduction is limited to $25,000 for these heavy SUVs. Because no depreciation limits apply to heavy SUVs, there are likewise no inclusion amounts for those who lease a heavy SUV.
Given these additional deduction allowances in 2008, consideration should be given to the lease vs. buy option based on the specific circumstances and holding period intentions of the buyer/lessee. For additional information and assistance in making your decision, please contact the Tax Department at KAF.
Source: Popi Barrett, Kirkland Albrecht & Fredrickson
Top
|
|
Annual Gift Tax Exclusion Jumping to $13,000 Next Year |
|
The annual gift tax exclusion will increase from
$12,000 to $13,000 effective January 1, 2009, the Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) has announced. The gift tax exclusion is
the amount the IRS allows a taxpayer to gift to another
individual without reporting the gift.
The increase means that more can be given away for estate tax
planning purposes. For example, a married couple with four
children will be able to give away up to $104,000 in 2009 with
no gift tax implications.
The tax code permits the gift tax exclusion, which has remained
at $12,000 since 2006, to rise when inflation would produce an
increase of $1,000 or more. This year’s inflation figures pushed
the amount above the next $1,000 threshold.
Source: Law Office of Donald D. Vanarelli Blog
Top
|
|
Applicable Federal Rates |
|
November
2008 |
|
|
 |
| |
Short Term |
Mid Term |
Long Term |
| Annual |
1.63% |
2.97% |
4.24% |
| Semi annual |
1.62% |
2.95% |
4.20% |
| Quarterly |
1.62% |
2.94% |
4.18% |
| Monthly |
1.61% |
2.93% |
4.16% |
| |
|
|
|
| Adjusted AFR
for Original Issue Discount (Code Sec. 1288(b)) |
2.20% |
3.35% |
4.90% |
| |
|
|
|
Code Sec. 382
Adjusted Federal Long Term Rate |
|
|
4.94% |
|
Long Term Tax exempt rate |
|
|
4.94% |
| |
|
|
|
Low income Housing
Credit
(Code Sec. 42(b)(2)) |
|
|
|
|
70% present value |
|
|
7.87% |
|
30% present value |
|
|
3.36% |
| |
|
|
|
|
Valuation Tables (Code Sec. 7520) |
|
|
3.60% |
| |
|
|
|
Deemed Rate of Return for Transfers to Pooled Income
Funds
(Code Sec. 642(c)(5)) |
|
|
4.80% |
Top
|
This publication is distributed with the
understanding that the author, publisher, and distributor are
not rendering legal, accounting, or other professional advice or
opinions on specific facts or matters, as each individual
circumstance is unique. In accordance with IRS requirements, we
inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this
communication (including any attachments) is not intended or
written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (a)
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (b)
promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any
transaction or matter addressed herein..
Back to
Newsletters |